cyberlife: i'll be back. (Default)
Connor, RK800 #313 248 317-51. ([personal profile] cyberlife) wrote2018-06-09 10:27 am

I WAS TANGLED IN ALL THE WIRES—



@connor.resnik | ■ ▲ ◌ ▼



strove: (carrots are good for your eyes)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
No, I'm asking because anyone who's spoken to him once can see that he's unstable. Maybe he was getting headway with like minds, but not most of the people speaking there.

You made an example that didn't need to be made.

And in my experience, someone like Matches? He's likely to go off and do whatever he's been told not to do. I've seen it before. He's obviously used to making a scene.
strove: (huff huff huff let's bring it in)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
The thing is, as far as I can tell, they were handled before you stepped in. I agree with your point overall, but you can see that, can't you? You can diffuse a situation with them without instigating a new one.
strove: (I see bad decision wheels)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying the method is a poor one, but you can't antagonize someone and hope that it goes in your favor in the end. That doesn't make you an objective party to bring that concern forward.
strove: (potatoes are full of carbs)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
I trust that you're familiar with Loki?
strove: (they just speak to me ok)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to make an enemy of him.
strove: (so maybe I don't know what fondant is)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
No. I'm genuinely trying to understand. I can firmly say that I have a feeling that until Matches actually acts on one of his threats, then you won't have much of a say. Putting yourself in danger won't help. And getting on Loki's bad side isn't a good idea.

And he will come to his boyfriend's defense.


[Used purposefully here.]

And his own, if he feels that's at risk. He doesn't need to visibly come to Matches' defense to make a note of what was happening.

That said, it's beginning to look like we'll be making the decisions on who stays and who goes soon.
strove: (but let's protect the eggs!)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
No, I'm trying to remind you that diplomacy has a place here, especially as we begin to move toward more autonomy among us.
strove: (Clarke would survive the dinopocalypse)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
We're not done here.

It's not Gaby that you'll be making your plea to, it'll be the rest of us. I'm not saying you have to think that far ahead. You don't. But we have to be cautious about which battles are worth proving, and which fires are worth starting. We can't risk splitting our numbers once we hit that point.
strove: (the Yankees won too many world series)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
Connor, I'm going to explain myself.

But first, I need you to understand that this isn't an attack.
strove: (they held hands into the sunset)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
First off, I'm used to dealing with teenagers when it comes to this stuff. So, if I sound that way, I'm sorry.

Secondly, I think we have to be cautious, because inciting certain behavior in someone can create a mob mentality against them. I'm not saying that Matches and Hafid don't need to be checked, but I sincerely don't know if you've seen where those actions can lead.

I have.

When my people first touched the ground, we were chaotic, loud, and emotional. I obviously wasn't one of them, but that didn't keep me from being swept up in it. Someone I know died during those early days, and eager to find someone at fault, they hung someone up because of circumstantial evidence. They nearly killed him. Imagine an image of a hundred kids standing around and shouting for that.

He lashed out. Rightfully so. He tried to kill the actual culprit. We exiled him.

That exile exposed him. He got tortured. I'll spare you the details, but it wasn't good. And it happened to him multiple times. Everyone had a good reason to have a problem with him. I was even the one who came up with the exile in the first place.

That kid is my friend now. He's saved my life. But if that torture had resulted in his death, I probably wouldn't be here talking to you.

I'm not going to say that Matches and Hafid are secretly good guys. I don't like them. They do present a problem for our group. I just think that moving forward, we shouldn't be quick to cast aside those of us who haven't actually acted in a certain way. Not yet. And consider those actions when we do.
strove: (teal was a much better aesthetic)

[personal profile] strove 2019-01-16 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
[Is it cold to see that Connor is too close to this? To believe in that? As far as Clarke can see, he can only see a parallel between what happened to his people back home. Does it make her hypocritical to believe that her circumstances are different? And where does Murphy stand in this comparison? Where people are wiped away and nearly forgotten?

Murphy hadn't felt he was important enough to matter to Clarke and Bellamy. A straggler. A tag along. He had accused her of him not being important. Now she's using his story as a weapon to try to keep Connor in line.

Perhaps she's too cold to assess this situation sympathetically. She's overly objective. Too removed. Not willing to think with her heart over her head. She hadn't engaged.]


You have to understand one thing. None of us would have acted on their rash suggestion.

You need to trust that. And right now, you're asking that we move on someone else's rash decision: yours.

I trust you. I'm your friend. That's why I'm even bothering to speak to you about this. Please keep that in mind.

And no, I don't expect a response.